You are viewing douglascohen

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Another New One

  • Apr. 2nd, 2010 at 5:01 PM

There are plenty of authors out there who have developed thick skins when it comes to rejections.  But there are also plenty who probably take it personally when their work is rejected.  Both scenarios are understandable, though I'd recommend falling into the former camp if you're serious about your writing career.  Regardless, this marks the first time I've ever read a cover wherein the author reveals how the last rejection left him/her depressed for a long time.  I've come across cover letters about authors considering giving up the writing game, but that doesn't necessarily mean being depressed over rejections.  That sounds more like discouragement.  And so, this qualifies as "another new one."

The author's depression doesn't in any way amuse me, because I do know it can hurt having your work rejected, especially if you're new to writing.   But I do find it interesting how almost five years later I continue to come across things in the slush I've never encountered before, things that have nothing to do with the actual stories.  And for those reading this on the website as opposed to my livejournal (and for those new to my livejournal), I've been blogging about new things (to me) I've encountered in my slushing for almost five years.  This is just the latest example.   

Comments

melissajm wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2010 09:15 pm (UTC)
I suppose it's a good thing that they tried again.
oneminutemonkey wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2010 10:06 pm (UTC)
When I get rejected, I'm allowed anywhere from 5-30 minutes of sulking, depending on the circumstances, and then it's back to business. :>
wendigomountain wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2010 10:53 pm (UTC)
I used to use that same approach when asking out a girl during my high school years.
douglascohen wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2010 10:54 pm (UTC)
Lol.
rachel_swirsky wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2010 11:01 pm (UTC)
That's sad. I kind of want to discourage that person from continuing to submit--some rejection is inevitable, and one's mental wellbeing is more important than publishing.
hkneale wrote:
Apr. 3rd, 2010 02:31 am (UTC)
I love hearing about new things. (We) Writers are an odd bunch.
fixnwrtr wrote:
Apr. 3rd, 2010 03:47 am (UTC)
I tell amateurs the truth. It's subjective, except when it isn't.
akashiver wrote:
Apr. 3rd, 2010 04:40 am (UTC)
That a person is depressed over being rejected is understandable. That he/she chooses to tell you this in a cover letter is, well, highly suspect.

Ah, people. To misquote Jane Austen, what else can we do but make fun of our neighbours, and be made fun of ourselves in our turn?
chellebelle74 wrote:
Apr. 3rd, 2010 01:48 pm (UTC)
Sure rejection sucks, but more and more I think I'm falling into the thick skin camp. I got a rejection letter last night and as my husband handed it to me, I said, "It's too thin, it's a form rejection" and sure enough, it was. Our new housemate went on a short rant about how much the people who rejected me suck (he's not a writer) to which I merely shrugged and said, "meh. one editor's opinion..." An educated and talented opinion, I'll grant you (at least in the case of this particular editor), but just an opinion all the same. One editor's rejection is another editor's acceptance.
mercuriodrivera wrote:
Apr. 5th, 2010 03:38 pm (UTC)
That's inappropriate to put in a cover letter. It comes across as an attempt to "guilt the editor" into accepting the story.
douglascohen wrote:
Apr. 5th, 2010 04:08 pm (UTC)
It's very hard to guilt me, so I wouldn't advise this approach. ;)

Profile

douglascohen
Douglas Cohen

Latest Month

May 2013
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by
HP.com/gwen