Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Writing is Like Darwinism

  • Jun. 10th, 2007 at 12:46 PM

So I'm going to put out an idea concerning writing fiction, and I wouldn't be surprised if others have suggested this before.  Writing is like Darwinism, i.e. survival of the fittest.  Not a hard and fast rule, but I think there are a lot of parallels.  For example:

--Writing: How many of those in the Writing Kingdom aspire to write "one day," but never get around to it?   Already we've sliced off a major section of competition, and in the Writing Kingdom these may be the weakest creatures of all.  They're not even writing, but talking about writing.  In terms of the animal kingdom these folks are moaning about hunger instead of hunting.

--Submitting: How many of those in the Writing Kingdom write but won't send their works out for publication?  It's one thing to hold off on sending something out because it needs more polish or another draft, and it's something else entirely to write piece after piece and never send any of them out for consideration.  If you're comfortable with writing just for yourself, great.  But otherwise you're the animal hunting mice in your cave while the entire spoils of the Galapagos Islands are beckoning beyond your proverbial door (are there mice on the Galapagos Islands?  Shrug.  I'd guess no.  But you see my point)

--Formatting: Let's use cavemen to illustrate some points, because cavemen are funny.  "Man next door has fire.  Me no need fire.  Me know what me doing."  Translation: "I don't need to read the submission guidelines.  I know what I'm doing."  These are the writers who fail to put their stories in the proper fonts, fail to enclose their SAE, or stamps, or IRCs, send fantasy stories to science fiction markets, send poetry to markets that publish strictly fiction, etc.  If there are better methods of hunting/gathering you can easily learn, use them.

--Thin Skin: "Me didn't catch anything today.  Hunting too hard.  Me would rather starve."  Too many writers new to the game expect to be published right from the beginning.  It happens to a few, sure (lucky bastards).  But most of us must claw and scrap for every inch of progress.  Instead of the Galapagos Islands it's more like hunting in the desert, I think.  A lot of people may give up and choose dehydration after one or a few rejections.  Whether they're the smart ones is another conversation. :)

--Frustration: "No matter how many times me throw this spear me have bad aim.  Me never catch anything.  Me give up."  Practice, practice, practice.

--The Slaying of Goliath: "Me killed a boar!  Me killed a  boar!  Me never hunting again.  From now on  me fishing."  For some people getting published once and slaying your Goliath is enough.  Congrats on your publication, but all this proves is that you can successfully hunt.  But you must keep hunting to survive in the vicious and unforgiving Writing Kingdom. 

--Overwhelmed: "How me ever catch anything?  All them other good hunters catching all them animals.  Leave nothing for me."  Stop worrying about available slots in magazines and competing with other writers.  Your only competition is you.  If you write a good enough story that suits the editor's needs for his or her magazine, you'll get your sale. 

--Laziness: "Me no feel like hunting today."  Hmm.  What could I ever mean by this one?

 So.  Are these exact parallels to animal kingdom?  Certainly not!  But the Writing Kingdom does have its own set of rules for successful survival.  By successful, I mean publication since that is what most writers aspire to (and should).   If I kept thinking about it I'm sure I could come up with other examples.  But I think I've made my point.  The fittest writers will "survive."  Of course, if others reading this entry want to throw out additional examples, please have at it!     

Comments

[info]melissajm wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 05:49 pm (UTC)
Now me want send caveman story to ROF. Me wonder why...
[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 05:56 pm (UTC)
Heh. Robert E. Howard broke in with a caveman story, "Spear and Fang," I believe.
[info]the_flea_king wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 01:35 am (UTC)
Really? That's TOTALLY AWESOME. I must read it. Also, great post, man.
[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 01:44 am (UTC)
I read the story in my copy of THE ULTIMATE TRIUMPH, one of those lovely REH collections put out by Wandering Star some years back (I'm lucky enough to have this one signed by Frank Frazetta). Quite fitting that his first sale came with Weird Tales, since that's where all his legendary characters first hit the pages.

Glad you liked the post.
[info]bccreations wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 05:53 pm (UTC)
--Writing: How many of those in the Writing Kingdom aspire to write "one day," but never get around to it? Already we've sliced off a major section of competition, and in the Writing Kingdom these may be the weakest creatures of all. They're not even writing, but talking about writing. In terms of the animal kingdom these folks are moaning about hunger instead of hunting.

These aren't writers, and they don't belong in the writing kingdom. They border the writing kingdom, sitting at the gated booth looking in, wishing they lived here instead. I get intensely annoyed when someone introduces him/herself as a writer and then begins telling me about what they're going to do some day.
[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 05:55 pm (UTC)
Fair enough.
[info]bccreations wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 08:40 pm (UTC)
"I don't need to read the submission guidelines. I know what I'm doing." These are the writers who fail to put their stories in the proper fonts

I've given this some thought, and while I understand preferences for Courier (although my company accepts manuscripts in TNR), why the hell do companies still insist that italicized words be underscored? Composition software can recognize italicized words for what they are. Is there any benefit from the words being underlined instead?
[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 01:47 am (UTC)
Some would say underscoring is easier on the editor's eyes. Others would argue that underlining makes the fact that you're italicizing a given word more readily apparent. If it's a whole passage you're italicizing, the editor won't miss that. If it's a single word in italics, well, we might ...
[info]barbarienne wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 04:03 pm (UTC)
Also, Courier vs. Times is not often a problem. It's the folks who use Zapf Chancery or somesuch who need to be beaten over the head.
[info]the_flea_king wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 01:36 am (UTC)
So to stick with the metaphor, they're vegetarians who eat that meat-like substance like tofurkey?
[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 01:48 am (UTC)
Sorry, you lost me. Which metaphor are we discussing here? :)
[info]the_flea_king wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 01:50 am (UTC)
Heh, this was in reply to the person about the people who discuss writing but don't do it. So, people who claim to be writers without writing are like caveman vegetarians? Crap, I don't even know what I meant anymore.
[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 03:40 am (UTC)
Well, it's still funny! LOL!
[info]barbarienne wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 04:10 pm (UTC)
These aren't writers, and they don't belong in the writing kingdom. They border the writing kingdom, sitting at the gated booth looking in, wishing they lived here instead. I get intensely annoyed when someone introduces him/herself as a writer and then begins telling me about what they're going to do some day.

-->Sing it, brother.

I handle these people in one of two ways, depending on their demeanor. If they seem earnest about writing, just unsure of themselves, I try to bolster their confidence and encourage them to try it. "If you want to write, you have to do it. You make time to write." I suggest the common times that writers steal: commuting, sitting in waiting rooms, lunch hours.

Sadly, more often these people are the (perhaps unintentionally) pretentious sort. "Oh, yes, I have a brilliant idea. I've been developing it for years, and eventually it will be ready and I'll write it."

Those people I cut hard and fast. "Writers write. Talking about it isn't writing."
[info]bccreations wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 08:17 pm (UTC)
"Oh, yes, I have a brilliant idea. I've been developing it for years, and eventually it will be ready and I'll write it."

Or the chart topper: "I have a brilliant idea, I just need to find someone to write it."
[info]samhenderson wrote:
Jun. 12th, 2007 01:05 am (UTC)
Oh, that drives me craaazy!
[info]tchernabyelo wrote:
Jun. 12th, 2007 01:12 pm (UTC)
Never come across one of those, but if I did, I'd say "sure, I'll write it for you - what kind of a split are we talking here?" And then laugh hysterically at them when they offer me anything less than 95%.
[info]kara_gnome wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 07:14 pm (UTC)
Great! I can certainly identify with a few, too, at various times in my writing life. Anyway, I enjoyed this enormously!

[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 07:49 pm (UTC)
Glad you liked. it.
[info]melissajm wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 07:58 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I've worn too many of those skins. Still do sometimes. This is good advice.
[info]domynoe wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 07:35 pm (UTC)
How about . . .

Me no need to learn from other hunters, I hunt good enough on my own. I don't catch the big animals they do because the big animals don't understand that I am a great hunter.

Okay, so not so great with the caveman speak. But, really, writers who think their writing is good enough and that they don't need to learn from others are another group just sitting on the sidelines.
[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 07:47 pm (UTC)
Me agree. ;)
[info]em_sky wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 07:48 pm (UTC)
Oh Great Slushmaster, oh wise and mighty God of the Darwinian Slush, you're too much. I love it! LOL!

And domynoe, that's not just laugh out loud funny, that's laugh out loud until you snort funny.

I don't catch the big animals they do because the big animals don't understand that I am a great hunter.

Ha! Still snorting... =D
[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 07:52 pm (UTC)
God of the Darwinian Slush? LOL! Now that's classy stuff. Thanks for the laugh.
[info]em_sky wrote:
Jun. 11th, 2007 03:23 am (UTC)
Sure thing, Chief!

(Cavewoman EM grins. EM make big animal Slush-hunter God laugh.)

I'd have sent you something funny this time around, but my last humor piece was pure pulp sci-fi.

(Cavewoman EM pats herself on the back. EM not fail Darwinian Formatting.)
[info]melissajm wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 07:57 pm (UTC)
And then there's "Me hunt great Elk, but other hunters turn up noses because it not Mammoth or Sabretooth. If everyone not think my Elk tastiest meat ever, why me bother? Me just hunt rabbits for self from now on."
[info]domynoe wrote:
Jun. 10th, 2007 08:01 pm (UTC)
I really do try . . . usually fail miserably when I try, but I do try! ;)
[info]timprov wrote:
Jun. 12th, 2007 02:32 am (UTC)
Me draw on cave now. Will always be meat. Successful hunters like straight draws.
[info]csinman wrote:
Jun. 15th, 2007 06:14 pm (UTC)
I enjoyed this. Also, it made me feel proud of my own attitude and approach to survival in the Writing Kingdom. Thanks!
[info]douglascohen wrote:
Jun. 15th, 2007 07:51 pm (UTC)
Glad you liked it!

Profile

[info]douglascohen
Douglas Cohen

Advertisement

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by
HP.com/gwen